268. Missing Number
Problem Description
Given an array nums containing n distinct numbers in the range [0, n], return the only number in the range that is missing from the array.
Example 1:
Input: nums = [3,0,1]
Output: 2
Explanation: n = 3 since there are 3 numbers, so all numbers are in the range [0,3]. 2 is the missing number in the range since it does not appear in nums.
Example 2:
Input: nums = [0,1]
Output: 2
Explanation: n = 2 since there are 2 numbers, so all numbers are in the range [0,2]. 2 is the missing number in the range since it does not appear in nums.
Example 3:
Input: nums = [9,6,4,2,3,5,7,0,1]
Output: 8
Explanation: n = 9 since there are 9 numbers, so all numbers are in the range [0,9]. 8 is the missing number in the range since it does not appear in nums.
Constraints:
n == nums.length1 <= n <= 10⁴0 <= nums[i] <= n- All the numbers of
numsare unique
Follow up:
Could you implement a solution using only O(1) extra space complexity and O(n) runtime complexity?
Solution
Python Solution
class Solution:
def missingNumber(self, nums: List[int]) -> int:
n = len(nums)
# XOR all numbers from 0 to n with all numbers in array
result = n # Start with n since it's not in array
for i in range(n):
result ^= i ^ nums[i]
return result
Time Complexity: O(n)
We need to traverse the array once.
Space Complexity: O(1)
Only uses a constant amount of extra space.
Java Solution
class Solution {
public int missingNumber(int[] nums) {
int n = nums.length;
// XOR all numbers from 0 to n with all numbers in array
int result = n; // Start with n since it's not in array
for (int i = 0; i < n; i++) {
result ^= i ^ nums[i];
}
return result;
}
}
Time Complexity: O(n)
We need to traverse the array once.
Space Complexity: O(1)
Only uses a constant amount of extra space.
C++ Solution
class Solution {
public:
int missingNumber(vector& nums) {
int n = nums.size();
// XOR all numbers from 0 to n with all numbers in array
int result = n; // Start with n since it's not in array
for (int i = 0; i < n; i++) {
result ^= i ^ nums[i];
}
return result;
}
};
Time Complexity: O(n)
We need to traverse the array once.
Space Complexity: O(1)
Only uses a constant amount of extra space.
JavaScript Solution
/**
* @param {number[]} nums
* @return {number}
*/
var missingNumber = function(nums) {
const n = nums.length;
// XOR all numbers from 0 to n with all numbers in array
let result = n; // Start with n since it's not in array
for (let i = 0; i < n; i++) {
result ^= i ^ nums[i];
}
return result;
};
Time Complexity: O(n)
We need to traverse the array once.
Space Complexity: O(1)
Only uses a constant amount of extra space.
C# Solution
public class Solution {
public int MissingNumber(int[] nums) {
int n = nums.Length;
// XOR all numbers from 0 to n with all numbers in array
int result = n; // Start with n since it's not in array
for (int i = 0; i < n; i++) {
result ^= i ^ nums[i];
}
return result;
}
}
Time Complexity: O(n)
We need to traverse the array once.
Space Complexity: O(1)
Only uses a constant amount of extra space.
Approach Explanation
The solution uses the XOR operation to find the missing number:
- Key Insight:
- XOR has these properties:
- a ^ a = 0
- a ^ 0 = a
- a ^ b ^ b = a
- XORing all numbers from 0 to n with array elements leaves missing number
- XOR has these properties:
- Algorithm Steps:
- Start with n (since it's not in array indices)
- XOR with each index and array value
- Result is the missing number
Example walkthrough for nums = [3,0,1]:
- n = 3, result = 3
- i = 0: result = 3 ^ 0 ^ 3
- i = 1: result = (3 ^ 0 ^ 3) ^ 1 ^ 0
- i = 2: result = (3 ^ 0 ^ 3 ^ 1 ^ 0) ^ 2 ^ 1
- Final result = 2 (missing number)
Alternative Approaches:
- Sum formula: n*(n+1)/2 - sum(nums)
- Using set/hash table (O(n) space)
- Sorting (O(n log n) time)
- Binary search (if array is sorted)
Edge Cases:
- Missing number is n
- Missing number is 0
- Array of length 1
- Maximum array length